tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-386077914312449748.post687080813147153609..comments2024-03-27T20:37:08.065+01:00Comments on Defence and Freedom: Kaliningrad Oblast and NATO forward deploymentUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-386077914312449748.post-82683613923050996842017-09-18T17:21:05.799+02:002017-09-18T17:21:05.799+02:00No, a coup d'état requires BY DEFINITION that ...No, a coup d'état requires BY DEFINITION that armed forces or police of the state itself move to remove the government. This did not happen, period. You use the wrong incorrectly as well.S Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03359796414832859686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-386077914312449748.post-45359022609963161822017-09-18T17:16:53.349+02:002017-09-18T17:16:53.349+02:00A revolution might have been what was hoped by cit...A revolution might have been what was hoped by citizens which were not fighting. In the end, the revolution was taken over by groups that are just as corrupt as the ones before. And the replacement of the old power forces was done illegally. So, no revolution in the end, a classic coup d'etat where some corrupt power elites are replacing other elites. The only difference between them is the master that is behind them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-386077914312449748.post-44815144977134964262016-07-06T06:18:48.272+02:002016-07-06T06:18:48.272+02:00@Morknecht:
Frankly, stuff your Russian BS propaga...@Morknecht:<br />Frankly, stuff your Russian BS propaganda into your private dark place. I'm not stupid enough to fall for it. (He sent a comment full of obvious lies and BS.)S Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03359796414832859686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-386077914312449748.post-55631698074159832792016-07-02T15:22:23.194+02:002016-07-02T15:22:23.194+02:00Yes, attacking a neighbouring country that had its...Yes, attacking a neighbouring country that had its sovereignty guaranteed by your country is aggressive, period.<br /><br />And the Russian propaganda line that the event sin Kiev constituted a coup d'etat or Putsch are nonsense because the definition requires police or military to change the government with force - or else it's no coup d'etat, period. The Russian deception through choice of words is meant to delegitimize what was effectively a revolution and it serves to distract from the fact that the government was evidently grossly corrupt.<br />Russia had no right whatsoever to attack, much less to annex conquered territory, period. It had Ukrainian sovereignty recognised and guaranteed.S Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03359796414832859686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-386077914312449748.post-73700910966315364752016-07-02T15:00:18.021+02:002016-07-02T15:00:18.021+02:00" Putin's aggressive foreign policy"..." Putin's aggressive foreign policy"<br /><br />You lost me there. Small defensive movements against a NATO putsch in Ukraine and an Jihadist onslaught in Syria are "aggressive moves"? How?<br /><br />The elimination of the ABM treaty by the U.S. and other U.S. policy measures against Russia are not aggressive then?bhttp://www.moonofalabama.orgnoreply@blogger.com