2010/06/09

The small arms calibre discusson: Tony Williams

.
Anthony G. Williams has published a well-done contribution to this decades-old dicussion about military small arms calibres:

http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/The%20Next%20Generation.htm

related:

http://defense-and-freedom.blogspot.com/2009/07/infantry-combat-ranges.html

http://defense-and-freedom.blogspot.com/2009/01/modern-small-arms-calibers.html

.
Labels: , , ,
at

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous12 June 2010 at 14:52

    the author is strongly in favor of 6.5 grendel. afaik those have serious reliability issues with mags, load cycle?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jan Reiter22 June 2010 at 22:17

    Another calibre discussion:
    Why can`t we break walls of afghan houses ?
    http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/598/

    Milan, MG 12,7 mm , GMW 40 mm, even the Bunkerfaust failed.
    Do we need a kind of "Sturmgeschütz" for our Infanterie or an IFV with a new caliber ?
    http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2010armament/WednesdayReunionRickWright9945.pdf

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)